Skip to main content

Can Grammarly's AI bloodhound sniff out text written by ChatGPT?

Web Hosting & Remote IT Support

Grammarly's expansion from writing assistance to AI tools that can write for you continued this week with a new feature designed to spot AI-composed text. Grammarly Authorship is coming to Google Docs as a beta and aims to help educators in particular work out when students are using AI to write their assignments. 

Teachers and education policymakers have been wrestling with the issue of figuring out when something is written using AI for a long time, but ChatGPT and its rivals heightened the sense of urgency for such a tool as they make the traditional methods unreliable. The difficulty has been compounded by issues around false positives and difficulties in picking AI compositions from those written by students learning how to write, especially those who have English as a second language. 

Grammarly Authorship attempts to address those problems by avoiding the way many existing AI detection tools analyze a text when it's done. Instead, Grammarly Authorship tracks the real-time writing of a text. Supposedly it can tell when something has been typed, pasted from elsewhere, or generated on the page with AI. The tool will integrate with more than half a million applications and websites, centering on writing platforms like Google Docs, Microsoft Word, and Apple's Pages. 

The feature can track typing as it happens and note when text is copied over or when an AI tool generates or modifies text, such as Google Gemini or Microsoft's Bing AI. Grammarly Authorship then makes a report and splits the paper up into categories based on if it was written, AI-generated, or pasted from elsewhere. It even shows a replay of the document being written to show exactly what happened.

Student AI Monitor

Individuals can purchase access to Grammarly Authorship, but educators are clearly the main market for the tool. AI-generated writing among students and in academic circles is contentious and has led to wrongful accusations by teachers, even as other students have admitted using AI to write papers that never get caught. 

"As the school year begins, many institutions lack consistent and clear AI policies, even though half of people ages 14–22 say they have used generative AI at least once," Head of Grammarly for Education Jenny Maxwell explained. "This lack of clarity has contributed to an overreliance on imperfect AI detection tools, leading to an adversarial back-and-forth between professors and students when papers are flagged as AI-generated. What’s missing in the market is a tool that can facilitate a productive conversation about the role of AI in education. Authorship does just that by giving students an easy way to show how they wrote their paper, including if and how they interacted with AI tools."

Of course, that only matters if educators decide to trust Grammarly's new concept. It will have to hit performance goals in real-world scenarios. That's on top of competing with possible rivals. OpenAI has developed some new tools to detect content generated by ChatGPT and its AI models with a kind of watermark. But the company decided against rolling it out yet, lest it cause problems even for those with benign interests. That follows the failure of its first AI text detector, which it shut down in just six months.

Though having proof like the Authorship report would remove the question of whether a student really wrote their paper, there's an inherent privacy issue that may make some reluctant to use the tool. Students may not want to share all the false starts in their writing or all the ways it didn't go well. There doesn't have to be a secret behind wanting only to share the final product. But they may not get a choice. Writing at home may soon resemble taking a test, where a proctor keeps an eye on students to prevent cheating, and even innocent moves may evoke suspicion. 

You might also like...



via Hosting & Support

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Microsoft, Google, and Meta have borrowed EV tech for the next big thing in data centers: 1MW watercooled racks

Web Hosting & Remote IT Support Liquid cooling isn't optional anymore, it's the only way to survive AI's thermal onslaught The jump to 400VDC borrows heavily from electric vehicle supply chains and design logic Google’s TPU supercomputers now run at gigawatt scale with 99.999% uptime As demand for artificial intelligence workloads intensifies, the physical infrastructure of data centers is undergoing rapid and radical transformation. The likes of Google, Microsoft, and Meta are now drawing on technologies initially developed for electric vehicles (EVs), particularly 400VDC systems, to address the dual challenges of high-density power delivery and thermal management. The emerging vision is of data center racks capable of delivering up to 1 megawatt of power, paired with liquid cooling systems engineered to manage the resulting heat. Borrowing EV technology for data center evolution The shift to 400VDC power distribution marks a decisive break from legacy sy...

Passing the torch to a new era of open source technology

Web Hosting & Remote IT Support The practice of developing publicly accessible technologies and preventing monopolies of privately-owned, closed-source infrastructure was a pivotal technological movement in the 1990s and 2000s. The open source software movement was viewed at the time as a form of ‘digital civil duty’, democratizing access to technology. However, while the movement's ethos underpins much of today’s technological landscape, its evolution has proven to be a challenge for its pioneers. Hurdles Facing Young Developers Open source models successfully paved a path for the development of a multitude of technologies, cultivating a culture of knowledge sharing, collaboration , and community along the way. Unfortunately, monetizing such projects has always been a challenge, and ensuring contributors are compensated for their contributions working on them, even more so. On the other hand, closed-source projects offer greater control, security, and competitive advant...

The Apple Watch ban is lifted, on appeal – but the reprieve might only be temporary

Web Hosting & Remote IT Support The Apple Watch ban story has developed quickly over the last week and a bit, and there's now a new twist: the US Court of Appeals is putting a pause on the US sales and import ban while it reviews the case, which means the Apple Watch 9 and Apple Watch Ultra 2 can go back on sale for the time being. "We are thrilled to return the full Apple Watch lineup to customers in time for the new year," an Apple spokesperson told TechRadar. "We are pleased the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has stayed the exclusion order while it considers our request to stay the order pending our full appeal." The watches in question are now once again available from "select" Apple Stores, and will also be going on sale from the Apple website from 12pm PT / 3pm ET on Thursday, December 28 (that's 8pm in the UK, and early on December 29 in Australia). All Apple Stores should have stock by the weekend. As for how long t...